Within the theology of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (Mormonism), Gethsemane—not the cross—often emerges as the primary location of Christ’s atoning work. Rooted in LDS scripture, and reinforced by influential LDS leaders, this “horticentric” emphasis has shaped devotional life, artwork, and doctrinal discourse across the tradition. While the crucifixion is affirmed, it is often treated as secondary to Christ’s suffering in the garden.
This theological relocation raises important concerns when considered alongside the New Testament, which centers redemption on Christ’s death: “Christ died for our sins” (1 Cor. 15:3); “we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son” (Rom. 5:10); “we preach Christ crucified” (1 Cor. 1:23). Even where other elements of Christ’s passion are acknowledged, the cross remains central within historic Christian soteriology. The horticentric model, by contrast, tends to obscure the sacrificial and substitutionary nature of the atonement, reframing it primarily in terms of emotional or internal agony.
At the same time, recent developments within the LDS tradition suggest a modest yet discernible reorientation. Public statements from Church leaders, evolving artistic depictions, and renewed attention to the cross in devotional practice all point to a growing crucicentric awareness. These shifts offer fresh opportunities for constructive evangelical–Latter-day Saint dialogue grounded in the biblical narrative of Christ’s death and resurrection.
This paper traces the historical development of horticentric atonement in LDS theology, evaluates its doctrinal implications in light of scripture, and identifies encouraging signs of renewed focus on Calvary. By offering a biblically informed assessment alongside a hopeful engagement with current trends, this study aims to foster deeper theological reflection to encourage gospel-centered conversation between evangelicals and Latter-day Saints.