Throughout various articles and entries in his Miscellanies, Jonathan Edwards seemed to be developing a unique account of the hypostatic union wherein the Holy Spirit is understood to be the bond of union between Christ’s two natures. Although Edwards himself never fully developed his Christology, several contemporary theologians have sought to resource his model for their own projects within the fields of Idealism, Augustinian/social trinitarianism, and Pneumatology. However, few studies have been conducted in developing the implication of Edwards’s Christology within the broader Reformed framework of the person and work of Christ as a whole. By evaluating Edwards’s thoughts in light of the relevant biblical texts and alternative Reformed Christological accounts, I will seek to expose two particular challenges contemporary theologians would need to address to make use of Edwards’s Christology today. In short, I argue that an edwardsian model of the hypostatic union would need to further develop his unique spirit Christology to better account for the true human experience of Christ and the Son’s proper divine agency in and through his human nature. To evaluate Edwards’s account of the hypostatic union, I will first survey Edwards’s writings on Christology and summarize his basic understanding. I will then raise two concerns I have with Edwards’s model of hypostatic union, namely, its tendency towards undermining the true humanity of Christ and its inability to account for the Son’s action in sustaining his human nature as he endures the wrath of God.