Last year’s paper, “Seeking an Autograph: an Investigation into OT Autography,” looked into the issues of OT autography and Article 10 of the Chicago Statement on Inerrancy. This presentation continues that investigation by looking at the possibility of locating the original autograph(s) in the protomasoretic tradition. The study engages articles and publications from scholars such as Peter Gentry, Paul Wegner, Michael Grisanti, and others who argue for a fixed canon early the Second Temple period, and seeks to answer the following questions: (1) after assessing these scholars (and others), where might be the best place to locate a possible autograph or autographs within the protomasoretic tradition; (2) is there enough evidence to hold to an autograph being developed in the protomasoretic tradition sans an a priori belief in such a tradition; (3) how does the chronological location of such an autograph align with the concept of the four-hundred years of silence that, by extension, means such a silence was broken; and (4) how might the other problems discussed in last year’s paper (such as having a possible non-covenant people overseeing the development of the text, or—if the autograph[s] are located after 170 BCE—having an illegitimate priesthood possibly overseeing textual development, and so forth) cause concern for locating the autograph(s) within the Second Temple period? The conclusion of this presentation leads to a follow up research project attempting to rewrite article 10 of the Chicago Statement on Inerrancy to better align with the development of the Old Testament while remaining true to concept of inerrancy.