When Must We Agree: The Role of Theological Triage in the Ministry of Charles Sturgeon

In recent days there is a renewed focus in some circles about the role of creeds and confessions in Baptist life. In modern practice a lack of a defined practice of confessional subscription results in confusion in determining boundary lines for partnership and cooperation. In an effort to determine these boundary lines, Albert Mohler introduced the concept of theological triage in 2005. In this discussion, the border between second and third order beliefs is vital for ecclesiastical boundaries and needs further clarification for modern day practices.
Further, as the discussions continue, it is important to view modern practices while remaining thoughtful about Baptist tradition. While finding balance between theological triage and confessionalism, the modern church is helped by looking to influential figures such as Charles Spurgeon. This paper will build upon previous explorations of Spurgeon’s practice of confessionalism and his relationship to the Second London Baptist Confession to explore his use of theological triage in determining his ministry relationships and partnerships.
Spurgeon remains an interesting case study due to his strong theological conviction alongside a willingness to work alongside other evangelicals. This paper will trace Spurgeon’s convictions and practices to demonstrate his approach to the modern concept of theological triage was an intentional approach for cooperation that is a valuable example for modern Baptist practice.